Being blessed by Rigoberta Menchú does not win me as many bragging rights in Guatemala as it does in the United States. Many Guatemalans a) don’t know who she is, or b) are totally unimpressed with what she has done.
She is a pretty controversial lady and I’ll do my best to explain what I understand of the situation…
She lied in her book. She said some things that didn’t really happen to her, such as that she didn’t have any schooling, she watched her brother get burned alive by the military, and that her family’s land was taken from them by ladinos, or people of non-native/Spanish decent.
Some guy named David Stoll did all of this research and caused a big stir, especially after she won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1992. (Stupid Stoll, cheapening my special moment with Rigoberta Menchú with some stupid facts…)
So here's the gospel according to Stoll: the Menchú land dispute was actually between Rigoberta's father and his in-laws. Her brother was killed by the military, but was not burned alive in front of her. Menchú had the equivalent of an 8th grade education that she received at a Catholic boarding school. (What a cake-eater, right?)
So... I obviously still support her and what she has done but I just wanted to make sure I laid it all out.
And now I’m going to offer some arguments in her favor that I think are legitimate. Some of these points were mentioned by classmates in a class discussion, and some are my own quasi-developed thoughts. (I gladly welcome any challenging or buffering of anything I put forth).
1) She says on the first page of the book, roughly translated, “this story is not only mine, but it’s the story of my people.” For me, this could be translated as ‘this stuff happened not only to me but to others,’ or ‘some of this stuff happened to me, some of it happened to others.'
2) The Western perception of truth may not coincide with the Mayan conception of truth. She grew up pretty isolated from the Western-influenced areas of Guatemala. I can't be sure of what “truth” means to them.
3) A strong sense of community likely played into it all. Community is a huge part of Mayan culture. All of the awful stuff RM describes did happen, although maybe not specifically to her. Could it be possible that the community’s pain was felt as everyone’s pain?
4) Her book was transcribed. RM didn’t know how to read or write in 1985 when she recorded the book with Elizabeth Burgos. It would be a lot harder to tell your story than to write it. I know that I am much more easily able to convey my thoughts by writing them rather than speaking them impromptu. Also, Burgos says in her introduction that she moved material around and omitted some material. You and I don’t know what that omitted stuff says. I'm guessing Burgos would have benefited from telling the most compelling, heart-wrenching story possible. (Not to question the moral integrity of Burgos).
5) Menchú was only 23 at the time! That is pretty dang young! If I had lived through such atrocities and someone approached me and said they wanted to write my story down to bring to light the reality of the 36-year civil war that happened in my country but no one knew about (including many of my fellow countrypersons) I might have embellished a little to make it a little more touching. Have you guys ever lied in a story to make it a little better? (Fact: everything in my blog is completely true). Maybe what she should have done after winning the NPP was reiterate her disclaimer, making it very clear that it’s the story of her people.
Rigoberta is not popular in the indigenous community either. I asked my weaving teacher, Amparo, what she thought about RM. She said that she used her Nobel money for her own interests when she said she would give it back to the poor. Amparo named two interests: her pharmacy, and her political party. I don’t know the whole story, but I personally don’t think pharmacies are too bad. And it seems like getting into politics is a good way to make some lasting change and integrate that change into the system.
The problem is that the lying thing sort of blemishes her political record. Because politicians don’t lie.
No, but really, Guatemala is not ready to have an indigenous person nor a woman as president. Perhaps Guatemala will eventually follow in the US’s footsteps. Shirley Chisholm was the first black woman to run for president in 1972 (but who the heck knows about that?? I do, thanks to Aric Putnam). 37 years later we have our first black president, who knows how many ‘til we have a woman? And who knows how many more until Guate sees the same?? (It will be many, many years, to be sure).

